After 12 years of working in – or adjoining to – the advert tech business, I’m coming to phrases with the straightforward reply to many miserable questions:
- How can made-for-advertising stock thrive now greater than ever?
- Why are self-importance metrics nonetheless broadly used to falsely show efficiency?
- Why is there nonetheless such restricted transparency within the advert tech ecosystem?
- Why are web site house owners nonetheless stacking their pages with tech from hundreds of distributors?
- Why are consumers and companies nonetheless not strictly shopping for on curated and vetted stock solely?
And the listing goes on …
The reply to all of those questions: Pecunia non olet.
Wait, it’s all about cash?
This practically 2,000-years-old Latin saying is ascribed to emperor Vespasian and interprets to “cash doesn’t stink.” When Vespasian (re)imposed a tax on the sale of urine from public bathrooms, his son Titus complained concerning the disgusting nature of this earnings for the treasury. Vespasian felt no disgrace and supposedly held up a gold coin, asking his son whether or not it smelt dangerous. Titus mentioned no, and Vespasian replied, “But, it comes from urine.”
Lengthy story brief, Vespasian couldn’t care much less concerning the origin of taxes. Cash is cash, and cash is nice. Curiously, nonetheless, the urine was a helpful materials utilized in tanning and different crafts. We are able to’t say the identical for a lot of problematic points in advert tech, which merely drain worth from the ecosystem.
I take into account giant elements of the advert tech ecosystem to be much like sewers, with a number of crap passing by means of them. The explanation for this isn’t associated to any technical complexities, as filters are available and have been for years. But nobody appears prepared to press the button that stops the movement of crap. Why is that?
Cash. It’s all about cash. Capitalism creates perverse incentives for firms and people to look the opposite means if there’s cash to be made.
Vainness metrics are out of date
Virtually precisely one 12 months in the past, I wrote concerning the Real Internet. I urged readers to chorus from treating the open internet as one huge bundle on the threat of penalizing real content material house owners and rewarding nefarious operators. This could be so easy to do, but it looks like the business hasn’t progressed – in any respect.
The explanation? There’s some huge cash to be made by wanting the opposite means, and, as Vespasian mentioned, cash doesn’t stink!
Each impression, high-quality or not, is a chance for a lot of events within the ecosystem to make cash. It’s a zero-sum recreation with a whole bunch, if not hundreds, of parasi – sorry, firms – attempting to nibble away as a lot of it as potential for themselves.
Sadly, many of the methods are simply gamed into rewarding stock primarily based on self-importance metrics equivalent to viewability or click-through charges, so a number of impressions are falsely portrayed as being prime quality.
And this isn’t simply true for open internet advert tech; the identical varieties of points are prevalent with operators of walled gardens. Simply take into account the current Adalytics stories about YouTube. Or when Fb closely inflated video viewership metrics.
Bundling good with dangerous to earn as a lot as potential whereas not getting caught appears to be the modus operandi for a lot of. With shareholders demanding steady development, who can blame them? But the sort of bundling carries existential threat for your complete business, as portrayed brilliantly in an iconic scene in “The Massive Brief.”
Too few individuals care concerning the origin of the {dollars} on the underside line in monetary stories, so long as there are extra {dollars} flowing in than the earlier interval.
Pecunia non olet.
“Knowledge-Pushed Pondering” is written by members of the media group and incorporates recent concepts on the digital revolution in media.
Observe Ebiquity and AdExchanger on LinkedIn.
